Evaluation Standads
Scientific Opinion
Title of the book:
Academic Pair:
Dear Reviewer, below are the indicators for the evaluation of the book. You must give an individual grade to each one in a range from very low to very high; for this purpose, you must mark with an X in the box provided. The overall conclusion will depend on the value you place on each indicator.
|
NO |
Indicators |
Very Low |
Low |
Medium |
High |
Very High |
|
1. |
Originality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Newness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Novelty of the investigation and value of the results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Scientific value if the conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Value of the book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Relationship among title, abstract and book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Quality of the structure and extension of the book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
Deepness in the analysis of the problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Scientific position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
Style and scientific writing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Adjustment to the norms for quoting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
Quality and newness of the bibliography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Insufficiencies of the book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nro |
General conclusion |
Scientific Opinion |
|
1. |
Accepted for publication |
|
|
2. |
Revisions are required (approved for publication when minor corrections have been made) |
|
|
3. |
Resubmit for review (subject to mandatory changes and re-evaluation) |
|
|
4. |
Reject sending |
|
|
5. |
Forward to another site (when you do not respond to the editorial profile) |
|
Other words of advice from the evaluator to the author(s) of the book
